Saturday, July 26, 2014
Death of Charlie
Charlie is called Giant Taro, Elephant Ear or Alocasia - grow everywhere in south east Asia very strong can thrive in any tough environment. We killed it by putting Charlie in the death corner of our living room. First Dragon (leaves dropped nonstop for about 6 month followed by root rot), second Non-name (attacked by mealy bugs then Joey's aggressive bug elimination measure - he is now looking like a plastic plant after we spray him with insecticide which we vow never to use again), now third Charlie.
I smell the funny rotting smell for a long time thinking that must be just the worm farm but last Saturday morning we found the huge trunk of Charlie near the soil is totally soft. Where ants have built a colony and mealy bug infested the leaves at the same time. We moved Charlie away from the death corner to the balcony and Jon convinced me we have to deal with Charlie now.
Charlie is almost 6 feet tall with a 30 cm diameter trunk - how to get him into the garbage bag with the contaminated soil is really a problem. We need a saw and hammer - I ran into the kitchen and found Mum's meat cleaver (when we first moved in, that's Mum's gift to us) and handed the cleaver to Jon, he then used it to chop up Charlie into pieces that can be bagged and chunked into the garbage bins. Including the soil - we are not sure what has caused Charlie's death.
I insisted to tip the garbage lady, she came around every day 10 pm, we ambushed her trying to give her some money for her extra work - she refused to take the money which makes me really uncomfortable. Jon thinks it would be ok if we tip her at end of the year - maybe it is enough to let her know we appreciate her work :-(
It is rather sad to see Charlie go, we probably will get some police attention if this blog titled as "We lost a family member and we chopped it up into pieces with the meat cleaver Mum gave us as the house warming gift and the garbage lady is the accomplice".
Sunday, July 20, 2014
Totally Unacceptably Bad Movie N+N Film (2)
I posted my comment (described in my previous posting) to the N+N film's FaceBook page. I understand I have attacked the artist - she might take it personally and I did get hit by some comments. The comment said that I am arrogant and I have insulted the artist and the professional judges by saying this film is like high-school-student's project.
Um, I admit that my comment is hostile and obnoxious. Nevertheless, I do think I have stated the truth. The film has made all possible mistakes a film maker can possibly hope to avoid. In one scene the little girl should be the center of attention but her pet turtle slowly creep out of the screen in the bottom left corner. The grand father hastily grabbed the creature to pull it back to view. No one cared about the girl but curious what has happened to the turtle. I am sure you have seen that in any home video, you set up the camera on a tripod stand and tell your 4-year-old sister to start acting. At some part of the film, you can see the little girl's speech was dubbed - the words are flowing out faster than the movement at her mouth! However, I have to admire the light technicians, it has been very consistent. Good job there.
Anyhow, the commentator was totally angry at my attack but ignore my other points, such as the film has not had a story line let along of passing any meaningful message. This film can make people emotional especially those who have lost or will be forced to move due to development. But nothing is black and white, why isn't the artist trying to show a more balanced view of this political issue so that we all can think why Hong Kong is where she is now. What makes me angry is those young kids (or old folks) going to the movie and holding a bamboo stick thinking "oh yeah, I have done my bit of helping social justice" and no one feels the film has not presented the adequate argument, explained historical background and delivered the un-biased discussions.
Perhaps this film was made to please the crowd - it is better to see it as the outlet of the angry villagers than anything else.
Um, I admit that my comment is hostile and obnoxious. Nevertheless, I do think I have stated the truth. The film has made all possible mistakes a film maker can possibly hope to avoid. In one scene the little girl should be the center of attention but her pet turtle slowly creep out of the screen in the bottom left corner. The grand father hastily grabbed the creature to pull it back to view. No one cared about the girl but curious what has happened to the turtle. I am sure you have seen that in any home video, you set up the camera on a tripod stand and tell your 4-year-old sister to start acting. At some part of the film, you can see the little girl's speech was dubbed - the words are flowing out faster than the movement at her mouth! However, I have to admire the light technicians, it has been very consistent. Good job there.
Anyhow, the commentator was totally angry at my attack but ignore my other points, such as the film has not had a story line let along of passing any meaningful message. This film can make people emotional especially those who have lost or will be forced to move due to development. But nothing is black and white, why isn't the artist trying to show a more balanced view of this political issue so that we all can think why Hong Kong is where she is now. What makes me angry is those young kids (or old folks) going to the movie and holding a bamboo stick thinking "oh yeah, I have done my bit of helping social justice" and no one feels the film has not presented the adequate argument, explained historical background and delivered the un-biased discussions.
Perhaps this film was made to please the crowd - it is better to see it as the outlet of the angry villagers than anything else.
Totally Unacceptably Bad Movie N+N Film
After watching this film N+N, my first reaction is angry. This story can be potentially made into a very good documentary that actually makes people think deep but you have made it into a boring film trying to stir up emotion. Besides, the acting is really bad (is this because the artist didn't have enough funding to get proper professionals?). Why propaganda - sentences like "government is useless" or "corporations are taking advantage of ordinary people" are said more than once in the film, why state the obvious is it because audience are all needing your education?
The young artist should have done better given her experience in stage directing. That makes me furious. The film basically destroy my hope that film industry in Hong Kong in the 21st century could have something original and interesting after the blooming activities last century. If the internationally recognized artist from Hong Kong produced a film in this high-school-students'-project quality forgive me for being blunt, what can I hope for? I do not think I am confident enough to watch another Hong Kong film.
Indeed Hong Kong is pretty dry in terms of culture and creativity, I suppose there hasn't been a sense of community, historical legacy because most of the population migrated to Hong Kong only recently. But the story, if we can ever say the film has a story, passes no message. Throughout the film I see a granda and a grand daughter hanging out mostly in the most crowded parts of the city and go back to their spacious country house so that grand daughter can have the space to ride a tricycle. I guess most people would like to have this life style - enjoying the convenience in the city and comfortable country house. The old man's home is going to be torn down - he can no longer take the best part of both worlds and that's why the movie was made?
At the end of the film, it says this film is dedicate to those who lost their homes because of development - so I finally grasped the message that the story is about against development. But please bare with me for a moment, may I know where the artist and the crew are living now? 50 years ago, it is most likely to be someone else's homeland, which was torn down and re-built. Against the development is layman's ideology. The high speed railway might have reduced the carbon emission given that train is most effective form of transportation. It could bring benefit to other part of the world, of course, anywhere outside of Hong Kong is not the artist's interest - at least I do not see it in her work.
My suggestion to her is that she should go back to school and perhaps take some philosophy lesson and learn how to write a convincing argument in a logical manner. Do not give me the excuse that I am an artist so I do not need solid training in academia environment. I think that's exactly what Hong Kong needs - we are trying to find the solution to problems, rather than arousing emotion to gain popularity.
Indeed Hong Kong is pretty dry in terms of culture and creativity, I suppose there hasn't been a sense of community, historical legacy because most of the population migrated to Hong Kong only recently. But the story, if we can ever say the film has a story, passes no message. Throughout the film I see a granda and a grand daughter hanging out mostly in the most crowded parts of the city and go back to their spacious country house so that grand daughter can have the space to ride a tricycle. I guess most people would like to have this life style - enjoying the convenience in the city and comfortable country house. The old man's home is going to be torn down - he can no longer take the best part of both worlds and that's why the movie was made?
At the end of the film, it says this film is dedicate to those who lost their homes because of development - so I finally grasped the message that the story is about against development. But please bare with me for a moment, may I know where the artist and the crew are living now? 50 years ago, it is most likely to be someone else's homeland, which was torn down and re-built. Against the development is layman's ideology. The high speed railway might have reduced the carbon emission given that train is most effective form of transportation. It could bring benefit to other part of the world, of course, anywhere outside of Hong Kong is not the artist's interest - at least I do not see it in her work.
My suggestion to her is that she should go back to school and perhaps take some philosophy lesson and learn how to write a convincing argument in a logical manner. Do not give me the excuse that I am an artist so I do not need solid training in academia environment. I think that's exactly what Hong Kong needs - we are trying to find the solution to problems, rather than arousing emotion to gain popularity.
Monday, July 14, 2014
The Hundred Year Old Man

Super Hot Weather
The weather is terribly hot in Hong Kong it is practically not possible to do any hiking/walking under the sun after 8am. We mostly go to the beach or swimming pool to train for the 4Km swim scheduled at the end of August - the Sun Moon Lake crossing. As the result, I am getting very tan. My back and bums are totally ridiculous, milky white skin and chocolate brown skin are separated by a clean cut line - this reminds me that the very same bathing suit have been with me for almost 20 years. Wow.
Wednesday, July 09, 2014
Meet up party

Monday, July 07, 2014
One more picture from the skating SunnyBay Disneyland Hong Kong
Sunday, July 06, 2014
Rollerskating in 33C
We must be out of our minds to go skating under the heat - the skate started at 2:30 and we came out of the air-conditioned train thinking this is definitely not a good idea. It turned out alright, once we started moving we enjoyed the breeze near the sea and tried every opportunity to move under the shade.
This weather is really challenging.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)